
John M. Williams
When
section 508 of the 1998 Rehabilitation Amendments Act became
law on June 21, 2001 President George Bush touted its impact
and federal workers with disabilities believed because of
508 they could do their jobs better and enhance their careers.
Section 508 requires that federal agencies' electronic and
information technology be accessible to people with disabilities.
More than one year later, the question arises, what happened
to implementing section 508? Additional questions are: Is
it working? Has it been embraced by the Bush Administration?
What are the manufacturers of assistive technology products
doing to ensure 508 compliance among vendors requiring their
services? What impact has 508 had vendors? Where are the
lawsuits from consumers with disabilities and federal employees
unable to access federal web sites?
The record on section 508 implementation is mixed. In fact,
a double standard exists on enforcing and not enforcing
508. On the periphery, section 508 is working. The Secretaries
of Health & Human Services and the Departments of Labor,
Justice, Defense, Transportation, Treasury and Housing and
Urban Development claim 508 is being implemented. And I
know vendors who were told unless they complied with 508
federal agencies would not buy from them. However, not every
vendor is meeting 508 compliance requirements.
One
reason 508 compliance is difficult is agencies have individual
standards that are frustrating and angering vendors One
e-commerce vendor who has contracts with about 20 agencies
told me in frustration, “All these agencies tell me
I must comply with 508. The problem is each agency has its
own standards. I can’t develop individual compliance
products for each of these agencies.” To correct this
chaotic state, the General Services Administration must
develop standards and ensure that every agency government
wide has them.
Vendors tell me they are told to contact assistive technology
manufacturers to learn how their products are adapted to
ensure they are 508 compliant but they can’t find
them. To correct this situation, federal agencies should
tell vendors to contact the Center for Information Technology
Accommodation (CITA), in the U.S. General Services Administration's
Office of Government wide Policy, who has been charged with
the task of educating federal employees and building the
infrastructure necessary to support Section 508 implementation.
CTIA gives vendors information on the government’s
buy accessible program.
In complying with section 508, the agencies must also know
how to contact manufacturers of AT products and how their
products work with products requiring adaptation. Manufacturers
tell me they have not seen an increase in the number of
inquiries by vendors since 508 became law. And neither have
they seen an increase in their sales. And yet there has
been an increase in the number of electronic information
technology products sold to the federal government. To eliminate
this disconnect, AT manufacturers should have a yearly Assistive
technology exhibit in Washington, DC. .
In the 16 months since 508 has been operating, I have not
heard of successful lawsuits brought by federal employees
with disabilities unable to use federal web sites. I have
heard the Department of Justice has been successful in negotiating
settlements between federal employees with disabilities
unable to access the web because of lack of equipment at
the agencies employing them. As long as the results satisfy
all parties the negotiations should continue.
To comply with 508, money is required. Federal employees
with disabilities, one of them well positioned within the
administration, told me their supervisors say their agencies
lack money to pay for 508 training and to buy the hardware
and software needed to ensure compliance with 508. Agencies
have a legal and moral responsibility to ensure 508 compliance
training occurs. If they are not meeting this obligation,
they should be sued.
I am
baffled on why consumers with disabilities have not sued
federal agencies for non-compliance. Before 508 became law,
I heard a streaming flood of complaints against federal
agencies whose web sites were not accessible. The complainers
said they were suing if federal agencies were not in compliance
within several months after 508 became law. Today the Social
Security Administration, Veterans Administration, Environmental
Protection Agency, National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration,
Department of Defense and other web sites are not accessible.
Consumers with disabilities have every right to access federal
web sites for information retrieval. After all their tax
dollars help support the federal government.
I have heard many reasons why federal employees with disabilities
are not suing their agencies for non-compliance. The worst
one is federal employees with disabilities tell me they
have been told it is unpatriotic to bring lawsuits against
the federal government during our war against terrorism.
This is dribble. Section 508, which is another way of publishing
information, was passed to enhance employment opportunities
for federal employees with disabilities. The futures of
federal employees with disabilities are at stake if they
can’t do their jobs. Ensuring equal employment opportunity
for federal employees with disabilities by making 508 work
is patriotic. I support this type of patriotism.
Additionally, federal employees with disabilities tell me
fear of retaliation has persuaded them not to sue their
agencies for non 508 compliance. There should not be any
retaliation towards an employee filing suit against their
agency. Anyone retaliating should be dismissed or demoted
immediately. When dismissal occurs, people understand the
message.
There are hundreds of thousands of federal employees with
disabilities. There are tens of millions of consumers with
disabilities using the web. They need access to federal
web sites. There is no reason to deny them access.
On
a scale of 1 to 10, section 508 compliance ranks 1.5. This
is a poor rating for an administration whose president supports
508. He can show his 508 support by ensuring the entire
federal government fully complies with implementation, then
and only then will we know what is happening to section
508’s promise.